tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-34346296.post7633541768718982387..comments2023-12-25T23:40:17.701-05:00Comments on Confessions of a Carioca: For example...Daniel Martinshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15980949721733826978noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-34346296.post-23778072628511994492007-01-13T01:44:00.000-05:002007-01-13T01:44:00.000-05:00Mark, the honor is all mine, as your blog is so--w...Mark, the honor is all mine, as your blog is so--what did I call it?--erudite. I think your ecclesiology is fairly common in TEC. That's why I pounced on your statement that I quoted; it is so typical, though clearer than usual. By my lights, of course, it is ironic that you profess attachment to "advanced" liturgical practices even while espousing an ecclesiology that would have given 16th and 17th century English Puritans a warm inner glow.Daniel Martinshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15980949721733826978noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-34346296.post-79378301740359536112007-01-12T15:08:00.000-05:002007-01-12T15:08:00.000-05:00Dan...what a great blog. Honored that across the d...Dan...what a great blog. Honored that across the divide of things you linked my blog. I like the visual tone of your blog and more your point. Strangely (or maybe not) I am fairly high church in liturgical practice. But in terms of understanding of church I suppose that as regards the institution I have a non-sacramental position. As regards the church as the body of Christ, I think I am highly sacramental, and I suppose must therefore have a high theology of the church as incarnational. Don't know where this fits in your scheme of things, but there it is.Mark Harrishttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06871096746243771489noreply@blogger.com